


Wow. I'm dumbstruck. An idiot highschooler is suing Louisville Slugger. Boy genius, DANIEL HANNANT, has decided that he was entirely too stupid to realize that he might get struck with a baseball if he was the pitcher on his high school team. This moron, has decided that Louisville Slugger made an "Unreasonably Dangerous" bat because they did not tell him he would get hurt if a ball was smacked back at him and he didn't get out of the way.
Well I'll be damned. Maybe if boy-wonder didn't throw meatball pitches the batter wouldn't hit them back. Maybe LS should sue him for throwing balls at thier bats in a way necessarily dangerous to all participants on the field. If the little punk would have been a better pitcher he surely would have been in no danger. Maybe the fact that he is so terrible a pitcher is indicative of the fact that he has terrible athleticism and slow reflexes and that is the reason he got bonked on his head.
Honestly, this kid is the grandest fuck I have heard about in a long time. Below is a copy of the lawsuit..... what a fucking idiot:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS -- LAW DIVISION.
DANIEL HANNANT, Plaintiff v. HILLERICH & BRADSBY CO., d/b/a LOUISVILLE SLUGGER, Defendant.
Case No. 02L 003935 filed Mar. 29, 2002.
COMPLAINT:
Plaintiff Daniel Hannant, for his Complaint against defendant Hillerich & Bradsby Co., d/b/a Louisville Slugger ("H&B"), states as follows:
PARTIES AND VENUE
l. Plaintiff Hannant is a citizen of the State of Illinois and resides in Pittsfield, Illinois.
2. H&B is a Kentucky corporation that is engaged in, among other things, the manufacture, distribution and sale of baseball bats, including aluminum baseball bats, throughout the United States under the trade name "Louisville Slugger."
3. At all relevant times, H&B has conducted business on an intentional, substantial and continuous basis within the State of Illinois, and particularly within Cook County, Illinois.
4. Venue is proper before this Court as H&B is a foreign corporation authorized to transact business in the State of Illinois and maintains its registered office in Cook County, Illinois and is doing in Cook County, Illinois.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
5. On or about April 1, 2000, Hannant was 17 years old and a member of the Pittsfield High School interscholastic baseball team ("Pittsfield").
6. On or about April 1, 2000, Pittsfield was playing Calhoun High School in a baseball game ("the Game").
7. On or about April 1, 2000 Hannant was the pitcher for Pittsfield in the Game.
8. During that game, a batter for Calhoun was using an aluminum baseball bat that H&B manufactured known as the AIR ATTACK 2 Model BB 12 [-5] Louisville Slugger TPX Bat ("the Bat").
9. During the course of that game, Hannant threw a pitch that was hit by the batter directly toward the pitcher's mound. Due to H&B's design and construction of the Bat, the exit speed of the baseball from the Bat was so great that Hannant was unable to react to the baseball so as to protect himself from being struck, and the baseball struck him in the head.
10. Hannant suffered serious and life-threatening injuries as a result of the baseball striking him in the head.
COUNT I
11. Plaintiff incorporates Paragraphs 1-10 as Paragraph 11 of Count I.
12. H&B designed, manufactured, assembled and distributed the Bat. At all relevant times, it was H&B's goal to design and manufacture the Bat so it would hit a baseball harder, faster and farther than a traditional wooden baseball bat.
13. At all relevant times, H&B had a duty to design, manufacture, distribute and sell the Bat so that it was neither defective, nor unreasonably dangerous when put to the use for which it was designed, manufactured, distributed and sold.
14. At the time the Bat left the possession of H&B, and at the time the Bat entered the stream of commerce, the Bat was in an unreasonably dangerous and defective condition in that:
a. H&B failed to observe known safety hazards of the Bat, and the danger of serious bodily injury the Bat posed to pitchers, including Hannant, in that the Bat, as designed and constructed, causes the baseball to be propelled with such velocity that when hit directly towards a pitcher it does not allow the pitcher sufficient reaction time to avoid being struck;
b. Failed to adequately warn foreseeable users of the Bat and those persons, including baseball pitchers like Hannant, who could reasonably be affected by the Bat, of the danger of serious bodily injury in that the Bat, as designed and constructed, could cause the baseball to be propelled with such velocity that when hit directly towards a pitcher it does not allow the pitcher sufficient reaction time to avoid being struck;
c. Failed to affix appropriate labels to the Bat advising of the danger that arises from the speed at which the baseball can be hit at the head and body of the pitcher; and
d. Designed, manufactured, assembled, distributed, sold and/or installed a product which . . . lacked adequate safety features during foreseeable uses, which in turn would forseeably cause Hannant personal injuries.
15. As a direct and proximate result of one or all of the foregoing wrongful acts or omissions, Hannant suffered substantial and significant injuries when the baseball hit by the Bat struck him.
16. H&B engaged in conduct which shows, at a minimum, an utter indifference to or conscious disregard for the safety of Hannant in that at all relevant times, and prior to April 1, 2000, H&B knew that the Bat, when used in a reasonably foreseeable manner, was sufficiently dangerous to cause catastrophic injury to a pitcher such as Hannant due to the excessive exit velocity at which a baseball would leave the Bat upon contact and further knew that the heightened performance of the Bat in this manner was beyond the reasonable contemplation of Hannant or any other user and therefore, unreasonably dangerous.
WHEREFORE, plaintiff Daniel Hannant prays for judgment in his favor and against defendant Hillerich & Bradsby Co., d/b/a Louisville Slugger, and for an award of compensatory damages in an amount in excess of $50,000 and for punitive damages in an amount in excess of $1,000,000, plus costs and for any other relief the Court deems appropriate.
posted by JM at 2:57 PM
